- Albe, K. R., Butler, M. H., and Wright, B. E. (1990). Cellular concentrations of enzymes and their substrates. Journal of Theoretical Biology 143, 163-195. doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80266-8
- Borghans, J. M., De Boer, R. J., and Segel, L. A. (1996). Extending the quasi-steady state approximation by changing variables. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 58, 43-63. doi.org/10.1007/BF02458281
- Briggs, G. E., and Haldane, J. B. S. (1925). A note on the kinetics of enzyme action. Biochemical Journal 19, 338.
- Bishop, L. M., and Qian, H. (2010). Stochastic bistability and bifurcation in a mesoscopic signaling system with autocatalytic kinase. Biophysical Journal, 98(1), 1-11.
- Burke, M. A., Maini, P. K., and Murray, J. D. (1990). On the kinetics of suicide substrates. Biophysical Chemistry 37, 81-90. doi.org/ 10.1042/bj1850771
- Calder, M. S., and Siegel, D. (2008). Properties of the Michaelis–Menten mechanism in phase space. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 339(2), 1044-1064. doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.06.078
- Eilertsen, J., Stroberg, W., and Schnell, S. (2018a). A theory of reactant-stationary kinetics for a mechanism of zymogen activation. Biophysical Chemistry 242, 34-44.
- Eilertsen, J., Stroberg, W., and Schnell, S. (2018b). Phase-plane geometries in coupled enzyme assays. Mathematical Biosciences 306, 126-135. doi.org/10.1016/j.bpc.2018.08.003
- Eilertsen, J., Roussel, M. R., Schnell, S., and Walcher, S. (2021). On the quasi-steady-state approximation in an open Michaelis–Menten reaction mechanism. AIMS Mathematics 6, 6781.
- Eilertsen, J., and Schnell, S. (2020). The quasi-steady-state approximations revisited: Timescales, small parameters, singularities, and normal forms in enzyme kinetics. Mathematical Biosciences 325, 108339. doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2020.108339
- Fraser, S. J. (1988). The steady state and equilibrium approximations: A geometrical picture. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 88(8), 4732-4738. doi.org/10.1063/1.454686
- Heineken, F. G., Tsuchiya, H. M., and Aris, R. (1967). On the mathematical status of the pseudo-steady state hypothesis of biochemical kinetics. Mathematical Biosciences 1, 95-113. doi.org/10.1016/0025-5564(67)90029-6
- Hoppensteadt, F. (1974). Asymptotic stability in singular perturbation problems. II: Problems having matched asymptotic expansion solutions. Journal of Differential Equations 15, 510-521. doi.org/10.1016/0022-0396(74)90070-9
- Laidler, K. J. (1955). Theory of the transient phase in kinetics, with special reference to enzyme systems. Canadian Journal of Chemistry, 33(10), 1614-1624. doi.org/10.1139/v55-195
- Meraz, M., Sanchez-Vazquez, V., Martinez-Martinez, F. (2022) A systematic derivation of the Monod equation for multi-substrate conditions. Revista Mexicana de Ingeniería Química 21, Bio2798. doi.org/10.24275/rmiq/Bio2798
- Michaelis, L., and Menten, M. L. (1913). Die kinetik der invertinwirkung. Biochemische Zeitschrift 49(333-369), 352.
- Murugan, R. (2018). Theory on the rate equation of Michaelis–Menten type single-substrate enzyme catalyzed reactions. Journal of Mathematical Chemistry 56, 508-556. doi.org/10.1007/s10910-017-0791-3
- Patsatzis, D. G., and Goussis, D. A. (2019). A new Michaelis-Menten equation valid everywhere multi-scale dynamics prevails. Mathematical Biosciences 315, 108220.
- Patsatzis, D. G., and Goussis, D. A. (2023). Algorithmic criteria for the validity of quasi-steady state and partial equilibrium models: the Michaelis–Menten reaction mechanism. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 87, 1-43. doi.org/10.1007/s00285-023-01962-0
- Rao, S., and Heynderickx, P. M. (2021). Conditions for the validity of Michaelis-Menten approximation of some complex enzyme kinetic mechanisms. Biochemical Engineering Journal 171, 108007. doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2021.108007
- Reich, J. G., and Sel'Kov, E. E. (1974). Mathematical analysis of metabolic networks. FEBS Letters 40(S1), S112-S118.
- Schauer, M., and Heinrich, R. (1979). Analysis of the quasi-steady-state approximation for an enzymatic one-substrate reaction. Journal of Theoretical Biology 79, 425-442. doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(79)90235-2
- Schnell, S. (2014). Validity of the Michaelis–Menten equation–steady‐state or reactant stationary assumption: that is the question. The FEBS Journal 281, 464-472. doi.org/10.1111/febs.12564
- Segel, L. A. (1988). On the validity of the steady state assumption of enzyme kinetics. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 50, 579-593.
- Segel, L. A., and Slemrod, M. (1989). The quasi-steady-state assumption: a case study in perturbation. SIAM Review, 31(3), 446-477.
- Tzafriri, A. R., and Edelman, E. R. (2007). Quasi-steady-state kinetics at enzyme and substrate concentrations in excess of the Michaelis–Menten constant. Journal of Theoretical Biology 245, 737-748. doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.12.005
- Yun, K. I., and Han, T. S. (2020). Relationship between enzyme concentration and Michaelis constant in enzyme assays. Biochimie, 176, 12-20. doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2020.06.002
- Zagaris, A., Kaper, H. G., & Kaper, T. J. (2004). Fast and slow dynamics for the computational singular perturbation method. Multiscale Modeling & Simulation, 2(4), 613-638. doi.org/10.1137/04060357
|